A statutory demand is a formal request for payment of a debt. It is a serious step that can lead to bankruptcy or winding-up proceedings if the debtor does not pay up within 21 days.
Think of it as a strong push to get someone to settle what they owe. But like any legal action, it has its upsides and downsides compared to taking the matter to court.
Advantages of serving a statutory demand
1. Cost-effective way to recover debt:
It's generally cheaper than starting County Court proceedings. There are fewer fees involved.
It can be faster, helping you get your money sooner without a lengthy court case.
2. Puts pressure on the debtor
The possibility of bankruptcy or winding-up is serious. It can motivate the debtor to pay quickly to avoid this.
The debtor has 21 days to respond, which can speed things up.
3. No court judgment is needed first
You do not need to win a court case (obtain a County Court Judgment) before serving a Statutory Demand. This can save time and get the debtor's attention right away.
4. Useful in negotiations
Serving one could encourage the debtor to come to the table and discuss repayment options or settlements.
5. Impacts credit rating
Knowing that the debtor’s credit score could ultimately be affected might push the debtor to settle the debt.
Disadvantages of serving a statutory demand
1. Risk of legal challenge
The debtor might apply to have the demand set aside if they dispute the debt or if there were errors in how it was served.
If the court sides with the debtor, you might have to pay their legal fees.
2. Potential to harm business relationships
It could be seen as hostile, which might damage any ongoing or future dealings with the debtor.
Other businesses might think twice about working with you if they see you take such actions.
3. May be ineffective with insolvent debtors
If the debtor has no money or is already insolvent, even bankruptcy proceedings/winding up proceedings might not help you recover the debt.
Going through insolvency proceedings can take a long time, delaying any potential repayment.
4. Strict procedures must be followed
Any mistakes in the demand or how it's served can make it invalid.
5. Might overlook alternative solutions
Jumping straight to a statutory demand might mean missing out on mediation or other dispute resolution methods that could preserve your relationship with the debtor.
Conclusion
Serving a statutory demand can be an effective and cost-efficient way to recover a debt, especially when you want to prompt quick action from the debtor.
It cuts through some of the slower court processes and shows you are serious about getting paid.
However, it's a heavy-handed approach that can strain or break business relationships and might not always result in getting your money back - specially if the debtor can't pay.
Before deciding to serve a statutory demand, it's important to consider the circumstances surrounding the debt. Think about the debtor's ability to pay, your relationship with them, and whether there might be other ways to resolve the issue.
Comments